Sprint Depth
Ensure your roadmap sprints reflect your strategy with a quarterly sprint depth metric.
Monitor Your Roadmap Accuracy
with the
Sprint Depth
Ensure your roadmap sprints reflect your strategy with a quarterly sprint depth metric.
From startups to large enterprises, Keypup serves all the unique complexities related to project size, structure and teams, including:
“Keypup is a highly useful and practical platform, boasting user-friendly features and lightning-fast report generation.
The service provided by customer support was excellent, showcasing their dedication to customer satisfaction. We are delighted to be part of the Keypup community.”
“Keypup has been instrumental in helping us gain a better perspective on our engineering activities and identifying bottlenecks. Its ease of use combined with its comprehensive features made a difference for us”
“Great product with great support!
Keypup is extremely flexible in its reporting. Once you get your raw data connected, there is almost nothing it can't do. There is a wealth of tables, charts and other reports available. As Director of a software development team, I use Keypup to report on our work efficiencies to senior managment. Keypup makes this task very simple to produce each week.”
Understand the Sprint Depth Metric Template
Sprint depth metrics measure the number of issues and pull requests that are due in a period of +/- 3 months. In addition to the sprint progress chart metric, this KPI depicts the total number of items included in the current medium or long-term objectives (e.g., quarter or semester).
How to Use the Sprint Depth Metric Template
Since your project management tool may already provide such information, the sprint depth metric does not necessarily have to match your actual ongoing sprints.
Instead, align this metric with your roadmap sprints, which may be based on quarters or semesters. It will give you a better idea of how close you are to achieving your mid-term goals.
At the beginning of the sprint, this metric should increase quickly, then slowly rise throughout the sprint and remain consistent toward the end of the sprint.
A major shift after the sprint start should be investigated, as it may indicate a drastic change in the engineering team's implementation schedule and a need for internal reorganization.